Uma proposta de sistematização da Teoria Institucionalista do Desenvolvimento
Resumo
O presente trabalho busca apresentar uma visão geral da teoria institucionalista do desenvolvimento a partir de uma análise sistemática dos arcabouço dentro dela, agrupando-os em função dos fatores que apontam como determinantes para a formação institucional. Ele se baseia nos trabalhos de Acemoglu, Johnson e Robinson (2004), Sokoloff e Engerman (2000), Haber (2012), North, Wallis, Webb e Weingast (2012), Djankov, Glaeser, La Porta, Lopez de Silanez e Shleifer (2003) e Friedman (1962).Referências
ACEMOGLU, D. e ROBINSON, J. Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth. NBER Working Paper No 10481, 2004.
ALSTON, L.J., MUELLER, B. e NONNEMACHER, T. The New Institutional Economics: Concepts and Applications, Cambridge University Press. 2015
COASE, R. H.The nature of the firm. Economica 4, no. 16, p. 386-405, 1937.
DJANKOV, S., GLAESER, E., LA PORTA, R., LOLPEZ-DE-SILANES, F. e SHLEIFER, A. The New Comparative Economic. Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 31, p. 595-619, 2003.
FRIEDMAN, M. Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2002.
HABER, S. Climate, Technology, and the Evolution of Economic and Political Institutions. PERC Research Paper, 2012.
MOKYR, J. Intellectual Property Rights, the Industrial Revolution and the Beginnings of Modern Economic Growth. The American Economic Review, vol. 99(2), p. 249-355, 2009.
NORTH, D. e WEINGAST, B. Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England. The Journal of Economic History, vol. 49(4), p.803-832, 1989.
NORTH, D., WALLIS, J., WEBB, S. e WEINGAST, B. Limited Access Orders: Rethinking the Problems of Development and Violence. Mimeo, 2012.
SOKOLOFF, K. e ENGERMAN, S. Institutions, Factor Endowments, and Paths of Development in the New World. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 14(3), p. 217-232, 2000.
